Close Menu
    What's Hot

    Justin Sun featured in Inaugural Crypto Roast and delivers keynote as TRON DAO serves as Title Sponsor at TOKEN2049

    BNB Price Surges Past $1,100 Amid Ecosystem Growth and Token Burns

    BNB Breakout Over $1.1K Leaves Bitcoin, Dogecoin Behind, With Ecosystem Tokens in Focus

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Friday, October 3
    • About us
    • Contact us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    kryptodaily.com
    • Home
    • Crypto News
      • Altcoin
      • Ethereum
      • NFT
    • Learn Crypto
      • Bitcoin
      • Blockchain
    • Live Chart
    • About Us
    • Contact
    kryptodaily.com
    Home»NFT»JPMorgan Eyes Crypto-Backed Loans With Bitcoin and Ether in 2025
    NFT

    JPMorgan Eyes Crypto-Backed Loans With Bitcoin and Ether in 2025

    KryptonewsBy KryptonewsJuly 22, 2025No Comments2 Mins Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest Telegram LinkedIn Tumblr Email Copy Link
    Follow Us
    Google News Flipboard
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email Copy Link

    JPMorgan Chase is reportedly looking into crypto-backed loans, signaling a potential shift in how US banks regard crypto assets. 

    The Financial Times reported on Tuesday, citing unidentified sources, that JPMorgan may start lending directly against crypto assets like Bitcoin (BTC) and Ether (ETH).

    The FT reported this may happen by 2026, though the plans are subject to change. 

    The report followed a recent JPMorgan indication that it is interested in stablecoins. In a July 15 earnings call, JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon said they plan to be involved in stablecoins. He said the bank will be involved in the asset class to “understand it” and “be good at it.” 

    The comments came as its competitor Citigroup announced plans to enter the stablecoin race. In a post-earnings conference call, Citigroup CEO Jane Fraser said the bank was considering issuing a stablecoin for payments.

    Cointelegraph reached out to JPMorgan for comments but had not received a response by publication.