Close Menu
    What's Hot

    French Authorities Investigate Data Breach of Crypto Tax Platform

    BitGo Stock Slides After IPO as Crypto Listing Volatility Returns

    GameStop Moves 4,710 Bitcoin Signaling Potential Sale

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Saturday, January 24
    • About us
    • Contact us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    kryptodaily.com
    • Home
    • Crypto News
      • Altcoin
      • Ethereum
      • NFT
    • Learn Crypto
      • Bitcoin
      • Blockchain
    • Live Chart
    • About Us
    • Contact
    kryptodaily.com
    Home»Ethereum»DeFi Leaders Push Back as DAO, Governance and Custody Debates Intensify
    Ethereum

    DeFi Leaders Push Back as DAO, Governance and Custody Debates Intensify

    KryptonewsBy KryptonewsJanuary 24, 2026No Comments4 Mins Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest Telegram LinkedIn Tumblr Email Copy Link
    Follow Us
    Google News Flipboard
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email Copy Link

    United States lawmakers postponed a planned markup of the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act (CLARITY), delaying progress on a bill intended to define how cryptocurrencies and decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms are regulated and prompting renewed pushback from DeFi leaders who say the bill still fails to adequately protect developers. 

    Industry groups and crypto venture firms warned that proposed amendments could impose requirements that are not suitable for decentralized systems. Representatives from Paradigm and Variant said the current draft leaves unresolved ambiguity over whether DeFi developers and infrastructure providers could be forced to implement Know Your Customer (KYC), register with financial regulators or comply with rules designed for centralized platforms.

    The delay follows mounting criticism from across the crypto sector, including public opposition from Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong, which led Senate Banking Committee Chair Tim Scott to announce a “brief pause.” 

    Continue reading

    Vitalik Buterin calls for a new DAO design for onchain disputes and governance

    Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin called for a rethink of how decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) are designed, arguing that most DAOs have become little more than token-voting treasuries. 

    Buterin said that this model is inefficient, vulnerable and fails to improve on traditional governance systems. He added that DAOs should be purpose-built to support core infrastructure like oracles, onchain dispute resolution, insurance decisions and long-term project stewardship. 

    Source: Vitalik Buterin

    He also outlined how different governance issues require different structures, distinguishing between cases that benefit from decisive leadership and broad compromise. 

    Buterin warned that low participation, whale dominance and decision fatigue remain major challenges, and said that privacy tools, limited AI assistance and better governance design are crucial to DAOs. 

    Continue reading

    DeFi protocol Pendle revamps governance token, citing low adoption

    DeFi protocol Pendle is revamping its governance model by phasing out its vePENDLE token and introducing a new liquid staking and governance token, sPENDLE. 

    The team said vePENDLE’s long lock-up periods, lack of transferability and complex voting mechanics limited participation, even as the protocol grew to nearly $3.5 billion in total value locked (TVL). 

    Source: Pendle

    The new token aims to lower the barriers by allowing withdrawals after a 14-day unwinding period, enabling integrations across other DeFi platforms and simplifying governance participation. 

    Pendle is also streamlining requirements for voting and plans to use up to 80% of protocol revenue for governance rewards and token buybacks. 

    Continue reading

    New SEC submissions press on self-custody and DeFi regulation

    Two new submissions to the US Securities and Exchange Commission’s crypto task force are adding pressure on regulators to clarify how self-custody rights and DeFi activity should be treated under upcoming market structure rules. 

    A filing referencing Louisiana law that protects retail users’ right to self-custody warned that overly broad exemptions in federal proposals can weaken investor protections and increase risks of fraud. 

    Another submission from the Blockchain Association argued that companies trading tokenized equities or DeFi assets from their own accounts should not automatically be classified as regulated dealers.

    The filings come as negotiations continue in Congress, with policymakers and industry figures pushing for a compromise.