Close Menu
    What's Hot

    Strategy Buys $2.13B In Bitcoin, Holdings Surpass 700K

    Why is Crypto Market Down Today?

    Ethereum bulls face deceptive on-chain spike as address poisoning surges

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Tuesday, January 20
    • About us
    • Contact us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    kryptodaily.com
    • Home
    • Crypto News
      • Altcoin
      • Ethereum
      • NFT
    • Learn Crypto
      • Bitcoin
      • Blockchain
    • Live Chart
    • About Us
    • Contact
    kryptodaily.com
    Home»NFT»Hong Kong Group Warns SFC ‘Hard Start’ Could Disrupt Crypto Firms
    NFT

    Hong Kong Group Warns SFC ‘Hard Start’ Could Disrupt Crypto Firms

    KryptonewsBy KryptonewsJanuary 20, 2026No Comments3 Mins Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest Telegram LinkedIn Tumblr Email Copy Link
    Follow Us
    Google News Flipboard
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email Copy Link

    The Hong Kong Securities & Futures Professionals Association (HKSFPA) warned that the city’s proposed rollout of new crypto licensing regimes may unintentionally force compliant crypto managers to cease activities if regulators proceed without transitional arrangements. 

    The warning centers on what the group described as a potential “hard start,” under which existing firms would be required to be fully licensed by the commencement date of the new rules or cease regulated activities while their applications are under review. 

    Hong Kong’s Securities and Futures Commission and the Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau are currently consulting on new licensing regimes that cover virtual asset dealing, advisory and management services, which would expand regulatory oversight beyond the city’s existing framework for crypto trading platforms. 

    While supporting the overall direction of tighter supervision, the group warned that implementing the new rules without transitional arrangements could create operational bottlenecks, disrupt fund management activities and undermine business continuity for companies already operating in the market.

    Hong Kong industry group’s response to regulators’ consultation. Source: HKSFPA

    Industry group recommends a six to 12-month deeming period

    In a consultation submission to the regulators, the industry group urged the introduction of a deeming or grace period for existing practitioners who submit license applications ahead of the regulatory commencement date. 

    The group stated that the absence of transitional arrangements poses a risk that legitimate managers may be compelled to halt their operations while awaiting approval, particularly given the complexity of the application process and the potential for backlogs. 

    “Legitimate businesses may be forced to suspend operations while awaiting approval,” the HKSFPA wrote. “We strongly urge the government to implement a 6 to 12-month deeming period for existing practitioners who submit their applications prior to the commencement date.”

    The new virtual asset regimes are still at the consultation stage and do not have a fixed commencement date yet. 

    Related: China-led CBDC project mBridge tops $55B in cross-border payments

    Industry body warns that rigid timelines could hinder adoption

    Beyond the hard-start issue, the consultation also touched upon wider changes to the crypto regulatory perimeter, including new requirements for advisory and management services. 

    In its submission, the association said that it supports Hong Kong’s efforts to integrate digital assets into the financial system.

    Still, it warned that the absence of transitional arrangements and rigid implementation timelines could deter compliant firms from participating and hinder institutional adoption.

    On Monday, the same industry group backed the direction of Hong Kong’s planned implementation of the OECD’s Crypto Asset Reporting Framework (CARF) while warning that poorly calibrated requirements could expose companies to liability and operational risks.  

    Together, the submissions highlight a recurring theme in their industry feedback, which is the support for stronger oversight in principle, coupled with calls for flexibility in execution to avoid disruption.